Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Film review for "Crazy" AH OUAIS LE FILM QUEBECOIS!!!


"CRAZY" FILM REVIEW

The movie contains changes in sexual culture which are neatly depicted. Dominant moral codes and forms of social control are also brought to the screen. The foundations for determining who or what actions are deviant in Quebec society in the 1970’s consisted of notions pertaining to machoism. Everything revolved around potency, power, and the manful. Due to these conditions, frequency of sexual activity was perceived as a “normal” feature of someone’s personality. Sexuality was a very vivid part of one’s own identity and built up the “self”. In the movie, we are conflicted with the push and pull factors of the deviance dance at work. The dominant moral entrepreneur being the Catholic church declares premarital sex being immoral and a punitive act. On the other hand, the community perceives active teenage sexual activities as an assurance of a sign of what some might call “stallionism”.
Taking a sociocultural look at the province of Quebec in the 1970’s, stepping back and acknowledging the greater scale picture, we can see where and how deviance plays a major role in Zac’s upbringing, idea of self, and fitting into this society. 

On the institutional level, the church plays a central role in the family’s views and morals. This is not indicated by their constant presence in the religious arena but by the director’s decision in frequently shooting and capturing items of catholic nature, such as the cross and several Jesus figurines. Instead of media as a mediator of meaning, we are invoked to believe and constantly be reminded of what lies embedded in these symbols, which take part in symbolic interaction. What is important to note is what Catholicism has to say on the matter that is being dealt with.
Interactionally, between Zac and his entourage, we get a sense of what is deemed “right” and “wrong”, “normal” and “deviant” through his various relationships and how they are carried out. An example, which can be addressed, is that of Reneault’s sex life. By hiding in the vent/cupboard, Zac is voyeuristically self-educating himself. Observing his older brother’s lifestyle further entices him to engage in similar activities with his closest girlfriend, considering this behavior “non-deviant”.

On the individual level we are exposed to Zac’s thoughts on sexual deviance by way of his prayers to god and his forced trip to the psychologist. He has this personal view of what being gay looks like. He pictures them as being flamboyant and publicly unrestricted in demonstrating their distinct sexuality. In Zac’s eyes being homosexual is the worst possible thing that can happen to him and for this exact reason he prays for “anything but this”.

Zac’s relationship with his father appears to be a central focal point of the film. This 4th born child of the family has always seeked his attention, approval, and acceptance. His father is his idol; he looks up to him as a dominant figure of virility and masculinity – the perfect man. Though in the beginning of the movie Zac and his father got along famously spending time one-on-one and bonding through inside jokes, this relationship reaches a major turning point.  When Gervais walks in on his son dressed up in his mother’s clothing and jewelry, he views Zac with an entirely different perspective. He no longer refers to Zac when exclaiming, “He takes after his father!” So, this significant other (the father) who’s ideas, perceptions, and reactions matter most to young Zac had a substantial impact on his future actions and behavior.

At school on the other hand, Zac wants to prove himself to the generalized other, being his schoolmates. Wanting to build his own image and reject others’ notions of him being a “softy” or even a social outcast, he deliberately gets into physical combat for no apparent reason other than wanting to demonstrate machoism.

For young Zac, he was initially described as being the “sensitive one” who felt and saw things in a way others did not or could not. He was from the very beginning characterized as different. He was also viewed as more feminine than the rest of his brothers. He was then evaluated with negative judgments from all his peers and family. Wanting to nurture a baby brother, dressing up as a mother, and acting more emotionally intelligent where evaluated as “wrong” in the society in which he lived. Moreover, regulation of Zac’s behavior then took place. He was made subject to a range of social treatments designed to control his deviance. For instance, he consecutively received “masculine” gifts every year for his birthday/Christmas (musical instruments, air hockey game table, etc.), his you carriage was returned to the store after the holidays, and he was usually blamed first for any mal occurrence in the household.

 Gervais, Zac’s father on the opposite hand is an emblem for masculinity. When he would drop or pick up his kids from school all the children would rush to the fence to get a good look at him and gaze at him with a gaze of praise. His long “flowy” dark hair, aviator Raybans, leather sports-jacket, and always riding up with his washed and waxed automobile. Everything he would do would exhault man-ess. Exhaling “O’s” when he smoked his cigarettes, cracking Quebecer jokes, these were all mere facets of his personality that when added up resulted in this positive public reaction. Those who surrounded him always respected him and regarded all his actions as socially correct for his gender role.  Subsequently, his evaluation was a positive one and his label was imprinted clearly for everyone to read and understand. Conceiving only males in the family proved he was potent and the personification of testosterone. So, whether he enjoyed singing or listening to music that might be classified as “gay” would never affect his identity since he had already achieved a master status of “the head of the house”. In turn, he was always herd in high regard and everyone would listen when he spoke – or sang.

Zac’s older brother Reneault also goes through the social typing process throughout the film.  In his pre-teen years he is described as the troublemaker with a bit of an attitude. He slouches on his side of the couch with his arms crossed and a “mean-mug” plastered on his face conveying dismay. Although his behavior is negative and he does not accomplish much compared to his brothers (not being studious or a jock or gifted), he is evaluated as a man. This is due to his figure, apparel, tattoos, his sex appeal to women (very active sex life), motorcycle, drug use (marijuana), and all around lifestyle. Once his primary deviance turned into secondary with the event of his mother finding his stashed narcotics he obtained the master status as “the screw-up” and build his identity around it. Everyone in the family knew what he was about, it was taboo at the start but Renault’s misbehavior did not match that of his brother Zac. The treatment he therefore received was pity through several of his family members lending him money and his father still treated him a decent amount of respect as he mirrored Gervais’ masculinity.

With reference to labeling theory, numerous examples of primary and secondary deviance are offered in the film. In this case, Zac has been tagged from early childhood as being sensitive and possessing motherly qualities – he is said to have a gift of some kind. This label has consequences in how he identifies himself and contributes to subsequent actions carried out in his life. This phenomenon clearly plays a role on the dramatization of evil. Zac performed acts of primary deviance, such as breaking his father’s record on purpose possibly due to his frustration with his altered attitude towards him. Another example can be wanting a baby carriage for his birthday/Christmas or dressing up as a mother to babysit his younger brother, which can be considered a simple “phase”. The problem with this is that he got caught. Furthermore, people’s overall idea of who Zac was was put into question and changed, which later altered the way he saw himself. Examples of this can be seen when Zac prays to Jesus asking why he is different and pleading “anything but this, anything but this”, fearing homosexuality. His actions then transform into secondary deviance taking into account the fact that he builds a lifestyle around his deviant acts. After the incident of him being caught masturbating in the car with another teenage boy (one that he previously got into a fist-fight with), he obtains a master status of “p’tit fife”(gay boy). From that moment on, his entourage regards him as being or having homosexual qualities about him.  

Tuesday, 26 June 2012

The pensive

Here is an attempt to draw then continue to draw while subtracting ...many comment on the size of his penis...look people I drew what I saw! It is meant to be as accurate as it is abstract.

drawing a man leaning forward...


My Claudel/Rodin kicks


I cannot get enough of this psychological love affair between these two. The two are a perfect example of how love can help one prosper yet bring them to their demise and self-destruction. Camille Claudel + Auguste Rodin...</3

Alex Anagnostou

Today I visited the Elena Lee gallery on Sherbrooke street! Most of Lee's pieces are from artists working with glass as a medium. This was definitely a no-snob zone. I was greeted politely, amicably, and asked a vast amount of pertinent questions which enticed me to keep looking and remain intrigued by all the glass work that surrounded me.  I heard about Agnostou months ago (in May most probably) and had wanted to see her work up close and personal. Lee made that possible taking me to the back office and even in hidden rooms. She showed me whatever she had in stock letting me approach and feel the artwork and even insisting I hold it to get a physical feel of it. I got to know the work and was even directed towards even more affordable pieces which I would love to own! (Especially a mini mandala - a smaller version of the one in the photograph...going at about 800$!) All in all in the near future I plan to return hopefully to start my own collection or for a small gift!
www.alexanagnostou.com/
www.galerieelenalee.com/

Tats?

Does everyone around me already have or is getting a tattoo(s)?
I don't think they think of this before getting one....


The social typing process can be found when individuals see others with body modifications such as tattoos and/or piercings. When in the descriptive phase, a label is attached to the person. This label usually is negative since body modification is associated with a broad range of risk. Many do believe according to research that youth bearing body mods are likely to come from single parent homes, belong to the low income quartile, have parents with high school diplomas or less, and have peers who use various substances. Later, in the evaluation process, people attach judgments on those with modified bodies linking their appearance with tendencies such as risky sexual behavior, substance use, violence, eating disorders, educational difficulties, and even suicide. Tattooed women for example remain stigmatized as being perceived as more promiscuous, less attractive (depending on the nature and placement of the tattoo), and heavier drinkers. In the final stage being prescription carried out through social control and/or regulation, these persons are treated differently in society’s arena. Companies for one will not hire those with visible body modifications for it does not appear professional in the business domain. Even in minimum salary earning positions such as retail, employees are urged to remove facial piercings and hide tattoos. Some have even switched physicians and no not trust those with facial piercings in the medical sphere. This is due to the popular conception that tattooed of pierced bodies are indicators of psychological and the behavioral problems. 

honestly now, unless it is very well hidden and in WHITE (elegant & subtle)....what is the point?


On the objective end, the individual is analyzed carefully. Modified bodies tell us about the characteristics of that individual. This perspective focuses on two issues: risk and motivation. Youth who have forms of body modifications are perceived as being ‘at risk’ more generally. By looking at someone with piercings and tattoos, their bodies tell us about their psychology and possible behaviors. For instance, a teenager with tattoos can be associated with problematic characteristics such as risky sexual behavior, substance use, violence, eating disorders, educational difficulties, and even suicide. 

From a subjective approach, the modified body however examines identity in terms of understanding the self. It explores the role of body modification in understanding developing meanings of the self in relation to others and within a broader societal and cultural framework. This is due to the body reflecting the individual’s understandings of themselves and society since the self is not purely individual in nature. It emerges via processes of social interaction. For example, we can use the notion of ‘front stage’ and ‘backstage’ self to distinguish why certain people decide to modify their bodies and in what location. Someone might for instance want to tattoo a symbol of undying love for their deceased wife on their back which will not be visible to most and the individual can choose whom to share it with.

Night owl

It has been said that the curious as well as the creative minds are those who stay up late to grind. The hours following midnight used to be my most productive.......I wish I had them back......lately I'm out like a light....and not like one depicted in this starry sky.