One of many important film classics
that the Criterion DVD Collection
offers to cinema aficionados and all those who are interested is Mouchette directed by Robert Bresson in 1967.
Mouchette is a story that stems from a literary antecedent written by George
Bernanos. It deals with a fourteen year old girl living in poverty. She takes
care of her ill mother and nurtures her baby brother, adopting a maternal role
that satisfies her for the first half of the film.
This antihero is introduced to the
viewer in a Bressonian manner. Without any establishing shots of locations or
introduction of characters, we are placed in a field where the apparent gameskeeper
and porter are playing a game of cat-and-mouse, observing each other’s partridge
hunting techniques.
Bresson cuts to shots of the men’s
eyes gazing at one another; appealing to voyeurism. This scene’s purpose is
only meant to introduce Mouchette and how she herself is an entrapped victim of
her succumbing community. It depicts human desperation and the human condition,
living in a world where suffering is inevitable.
Violence is recurrent throughout the
film, making Mouchette a target not only by her neglectful parents and society
but also playful one in the eyes of a teenage boy who consecutively keeps
banging into her as they are playing bumper cars at the fair. The act is
physical violence (a.k.a. crashing) but it seems to please her. Mouchette is
also targeted when Arsene goes to rape her. She attempts to hide but it seems
that she isn’t trying whole heartedly to avoid his pursuit. Even when he is on
top of her we don’t see her exhaustively struggling, she rather gives in
quickly assuming her fate.
Whatever events occur in Mouchette happen to teach the main
character lessons on sex and death, which is characteristic of 20th
century French cinema.
Environment has an effect on this
young girl’s personality. Just as John Locke once stated, our sensorial
experiences will shape the person we become. What we experience in our lifetime
will unavoidably have an impact on our character and who we are.
Mouchette, in this case does not
inhabit a highly moral community. An illustrating example is when the police is
aware of bootlegged alcohol being brought into the local bar late at night and
do not bother to interfere. Another is that the entire village seems to know
about the love triangle between the barmaid Louisa, Matthieu, and Arsene and
treat it as a normal phenomenon. A final example can be that on a fine Sunday
morning, while church bells are ringing and the town should be attending
communion, Bresson in only interested in showing us the villagers’ leisurely
activities at Chez Fernand.
The climatic point in the film is
where Mouchette goes wandering off into the forest during a so called
“cyclone”. This night is considered to be a psychological rubicon that forever
changes her life. It is also when we get to actually hear this unfortunate girl
carry out an extensive dialogue with Arsene, the only character in the film
that treats her as an equal. This allows the audience to finally have some insight
on her thought process. We are given a chance to know what goes on inside
Mouchette considering Bresson goes easy on the dialogue throughout the entire
film, not making characters speak for no reason.
Mouchette is a child reacting to
tragic situations while finding solidarity in evil. This adolescent’s name even
hints her position in society, being “little fly” in French. This is something
she rejects and protests by stomping her feet more than once in the film.
Mouchette is
mainly constructed around the theme of transformation of the soul during the
transition from girlhood to adolescence. The question Bresson wishes to address
in his work here is “What is left of us when we’re gone?” something Mouchette’s
dieing mother asks herself (or God) in the beginning of the film in the midst
of prayer in church. Throughout the film, the one who doubtlessly goes missing
is Mouchette.
The reccuring theme of absence is
portrayed not only in Mouchette’s disappearance but by her “lover” Arsene who
claims he feels absent right before his epileptic attack and also by Mouchette
taking her own life in the film’s final scene.
During this final sequence, Monteverdi’s
Magnificat is being played as
non-diegetic music. This is said to have a sacred connotation also pointing to
Bresson’s personal preferences as a Christian and including his beliefs in his
works making him what many call a “Christian artist”. Apart from suicide, which
is frowned upon in Christian faith, the afterlife is a promised land that is
ultimately better than life itself. To come to a clear deduction, we can
presume that Mouchette is looking for better life quality by ending hers
entirely. Not being fazed by death, she decides to commit suicide by rolling in
a pond and subsequently drowning. This isn’t necessarily shown by Bresson,
which is characteristic of him leaving viewers to infer. He films her rolling
into the lake, we hear a splash, and then we are given a shot of the lake with
ripples. This is a sacralized symbolic moment where Mouchette has broken free
from the trap that is her life.
The language of this moving picture
indicates that its narrative is linear as time runs forward chronologically and
the events follow the basic structure of: equilibrium, a crisis occurring, and
the crisis being somewhat resolved. The events are therefore linked by cause
and effect. The sound in this film is
very pure and true; it usually comes from identifiable sources. Music is used
to transform, according to Bresson, not underscore or emphasize a situation. Background
music isn’t added on as an ornament to beautify or idealize the motion picture
in any fashion. On the topic of production, this film was shot on location,
without the use of a constructed Hollywood
set, which made it realistic and more concentrated on the people at hand and on
humanity.
Bresson stresses the “figure,
expression & movement” element of mise-en-scene. His inspiration from
painting is evidently manifested in his compositions. A painter has to decide
what to include in his canvas, and now as a filmmaker in a shot. We see his
artistic abilities when Mouchette is throwing dirt on her classmates. We are
invited to look only where the dirt lands (ex: student’s school bag or student’s
back). Bresson pays close attention to
form since composition in his perspective must express something and value an
idea.
Bresson’s films, such as the one in
question, require conscious participation by the viewer to extract any value
from what is being presented. He has the capability to turn a hot medium into a
cool one (in the words of Marshall McLuhan). Bresson takes moving images far
beyond stimulating just one sense (vision). He is clearly conscious of his
power as a mediator between the viewer and the reality he chooses to expose.
With this in mind, he strictly orchestrates all of the actor’s movements
by even numbering their footsteps and making diagrams on the floor to guide
their path. Also, since they are not trained professionals, he lets their true
personality shine through the characters in a limited context. This is
Bresson’s idea of "cinematography" that doesn’t have anything to do
with its usual definition of “camerawork”. It was a discovery process for
Bresson to use non-professional actors or what he referred to as
"models" to capture the true essence of a person. He rejected the
idea of the viewer being distracted by a known face or bringing to mind another
film they starred in. He was against storyboards and accepted new ideas as they
came from the novelty cast. “Films can only be made by bypassing
the will of those who appear in them, using not what they do, but what they are”,
claims the French auteur.
Some editing techniques adopted by
Bresson include the shot-reverse shot and graphic matching. Although the
shot-reverse-shot method is also used in Hollywood
films, here he plays with mise-en-scene simultaneously, adding objects in the
way of two people conversing creating a visual obstruction. He also uses
graphic matching when he transitions from the scene where Mouchette is pushed
onto a church fountain by her father, which she brushes off by performing a
Christian ritual to a mid-shot of her washing her hands in the sink of the bar
and wiping them on her apron.
The DVD of this film is accompanied by numerous supplemental
features. These include an audio commentary by renowned film
scholar Tony Rayns, a half-hour documentary about the director called Au
hasard Bresson, a segment
from the cine-magazine TV series CinĂ©ma entitled “Traveling,” featuring on-set interviews with Bresson
and actors Nadine Nortier and Jean-Claude Guilbert, and the original theatrical
trailer by Jean-Luc Godard.
Out of all the special features
presented on this DVD, the two I considered being the most important were the
audio commentary and the Au hasard Bresson documentary.
Getting additional information on the
film’s entirety was a plus. In these supplementary features, noteably the
commentary, we are guided through every scene that is being deconstructed by
Rayns. In the documentary, we are given the filmmaker’s perspective on the film
and beneficial insight that is highly informative. We also get to watch Bresson
at work directing the cast and most importantly Nadine Nortier who plays
Mouchette. Here we bare witness to how important the notion of movement is to
Bresson. In addition, it familiarizes the audience with the “Bressonian” approach
to filmmaking.
Watching concrete bonus material can increase
one’s knowledge and appreciation of cinema in general because it gives the
viewers all the extra information they need to have a whole encompassed view of
the film. The commentary is not the Hollywood
style we are used to that is unecassary, where the actors discuss difficulties
in shooting certain scenes or have simple conversation on movie making in
general.
Even if this film appears to follow a
coherent chronological order, the themes addressed are presented in a complex
yet realist fashion. In brief, the special features annexed by the Criterion Collection are of imperative
importance to the viewer who wishes to truly understand the film in its entirety,
as a work of art.
No comments:
Post a Comment